{"id":7359,"date":"2023-03-13T05:59:40","date_gmt":"2023-03-13T10:59:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=7359"},"modified":"2023-03-13T06:00:13","modified_gmt":"2023-03-13T11:00:13","slug":"little-fissures-the-u-s-ukraine-war-unity-is-slowly-cracking-apart","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=7359","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Little fissures\u2019: The U.S.-Ukraine war unity is slowly cracking apart<\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The United States and Ukraine have largely been in lockstep since President Joe Biden\u2019s administration pledged support for \u201cas long as it takes\u201d in resisting Moscow\u2019s relentless invasion.
But more than a year into the war, there are growing differences behind the scenes between Washington and Kyiv on war aims, and potential flashpoints loom on how, and when, the conflict will end.
\u201cThe administration doesn\u2019t have a clear policy objective and a clear goal. Is it to drag this thing out, which is precisely what Vladimir Putin wants?\u201d said Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. \u201cIs it to just give them enough to survive and not to win? I don\u2019t see a policy for victory right now, and if we don\u2019t have that, then what are we doing?\u201d
Publicly, there has been little separation between Biden and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, an alliance on full display last month when the American president made his covert, dramatic visit to Kyiv. But based on conversations with 10 officials, lawmakers and experts, new points of tension are emerging: The sabotage of a natural gas pipeline on the floor of the Atlantic Ocean; the brutal, draining defense of a strategically unimportant Ukrainian city; and a plan to fight for a region where Russian forces have been entrenched for nearly a decade.
Senior administration officials maintain that unity between Washington and Kyiv is tight. But the fractures that have appeared are making it harder to credibly claim there\u2019s little daylight between the U.S. and Ukraine as sunbeams streak through the cracks.
For nine months, Russia has laid siege to Bakhmut, though capturing the southeastern Ukrainian city would do little to alter the trajectory of the war. It has become the focal point of the fight in recent weeks, with troops and prisoners from the mercenary Wagner Group leading the combat against Ukrainian forces. Both sides have suffered heavy losses and reduced the city to smoldering ruins.
Ukraine has dug in, refusing to abandon the ruined city even at tremendous cost.
\u201cEach day of the city\u2019s defense allows us to gain time to prepare reserves and prepare for future offensive operations,\u201d said Col. Gen. Oleksandr Syrskyi, the commander of Ukraine\u2019s ground forces. \u201cAt the same time, in the battles for this fortress, the enemy loses the most prepared and combat-capable part of his army \u2014 Wagner\u2019s assault troops.\u201d
Multiple administration officials have begun worrying that Ukraine is expending so much manpower and ammunition in Bakhmut that it could sap their ability to mount a major counteroffensive in the spring.
\u201cI certainly don\u2019t want to discount the tremendous work that the Ukrainians\u2019 soldiers and leaders have put into defending Bakhmut \u2014 but I think it\u2019s more of a symbolic value than it is a strategic and operational value,\u201d said Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
Kyiv, for now, has ignored Washington\u2019s input.
Meanwhile, an assessment by U.S. intelligence suggested that a \u201cpro-Ukraine group\u201d was responsible for the destruction of the Nord Stream natural gas pipelines last fall, shedding light on a great mystery. The new intelligence, first reported by The New York Times, was short on details but appeared to knock down a theory that Moscow was responsible for sabotaging the pipelines that delivered Russian gas to Europe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Intelligence analysts do not believe Zelenskyy or his aides were involved in the sabotage, but the Biden administration has signaled to Kyiv \u2014 much like it did when a car bomb in Moscow killed the daughter of a prominent Russian nationalist last year \u2014 that certain acts of violence outside of Ukraine\u2019s borders will not be tolerated.
There has also been, at times, frustration about Washington\u2019s delivery of weapons to Ukraine. The United States has, by far, sent the most weapons and equipment to the front, but Kyiv has always looked ahead for the next set of supplies. Though most in the administration have been understanding about Kyiv\u2019s desperation to defend itself, there have been grumblings about the constant requests and, at times, Zelenskyy not showing appropriate gratitude, according to two White House officials not authorized to speak publicly about private conversations.
\u201cI do think the administration is split, the National Security Council split\u201d on what weapons to send to Ukraine, said McCaul, who\u2019s in constant touch with senior Biden officials. \u201cI talk to a lot of top military brass and they are, in large part, supportive of giving them the ATACMS.\u201d
The administration hasn\u2019t provided those long-range missiles because there are few to spare in America\u2019s own arsenal. There\u2019s also fear that Ukraine might strike faraway Russian targets, potentially escalating the war.
A recent report that the Pentagon was blocking the Biden administration from sharing evidence of possible Russian war crimes with the International Criminal Court also put another dent in the unity narrative. White House officials were dismayed when the New York Times story came out, fearful it would damage the moral case the U.S. has made for supporting Ukraine against Russian war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The administration definitively declared the alliance between the United States \u2014 and its allies \u2014 and Kyiv remained strong, and that it would last as long as the war raged.
National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson said the White House is \u201cin constant communication with Ukraine as we support their defense of their sovereignty and territorial integrity.\u201d She added that with Putin showing no signs of ceasing his war, \u201cthe best thing we can do is to continue to help Ukraine succeed on the battlefield so they can be in the strongest possible position at the negotiating table for when that time comes.\u201d
But the growing disconnects may foreshadow a larger divide over the debate as to how the war will end.
Though Biden has pledged steadfast support, and the coffers remain open for now, the U.S. has been clear with Kyiv that it cannot fund Ukraine indefinitely at this level. Though backing Ukraine has largely been a bipartisan effort, a small but growing number of Republicans have begun to voice skepticism about the use of American treasure to support Kyiv without an end in sight to a distant war.
Among those who have expressed doubt about support for the long haul is House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, who has said that the U.S. would not offer a \u201cblank check\u201d to Ukraine and rejected Zelenskyy\u2019s invitation to travel to Kyiv and learn about the realities of war.
\u201cThere is always some friction built in,\u201d said Kurt Volker, a special presidential envoy for Ukraine during the Trump administration. \u201cZelenskyy also stepped in it a bit with McCarthy \u2014 coming across as needing to \u2018educate\u2019 him, rather than work with him.\u201d
But many observers credit remarkable transatlantic unity, praising the alliance holding firm despite the economic and political toll the war has taken.
\u201cI see the little fissures, but those have existed with points of disagreement and varied views between the U.S. and Ukraine even before the big February invasion, and since then,\u201d said Shelby Magid, deputy director of the Atlantic Council\u2019s Eurasia Center. \u201cZelenskyy has made pointed remarks before toward the U.S., and the White House has expressed disagreement with him \u2014 publicly and privately \u2014 on specific aspects, but that hasn\u2019t shifted or eaten away at the overall U.S. support and partnership.\u201d
Points of crisis still hover on the horizon. Zelenskyy\u2019s insistence that all of Ukraine \u2014 including Crimea, which has been under Russian control since 2014 \u2014 be returned to Ukraine before any peace negotiations begin would only extend the war, U.S. officials believe. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has signaled to Kyiv that Ukraine\u2019s potential recapture of Crimea would be a red line for Putin, possibly leading to a dramatic escalation from Moscow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, the Pentagon has consistently expressed doubts whether Ukraine\u2019s forces \u2014 despite being armed with sophisticated Western weapons \u2014 would be able to dislodge Russia from Crimea, where it has been entrenched for nearly a decade.
For now, Biden continued to stick to his refrain that the United States will leave all decisions about war and peace to Zelenskky. But whispers have begun across Washington as to how tenable that will be as the war grinds on \u2014 and another presidential election looms.
\u201cThere has never been a war in history without setbacks and challenges,\u201d said Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), an Army veteran and HFAC member. \u201cThe question is not whether Ukrainians have setbacks, but how they respond and overcome them. Ukraine will overcome, defeat Russia and remain free.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Politico<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The United States and Ukraine have largely been in lockstep since President Joe Biden\u2019s administration pledged support for \u201cas long as it takes\u201d in resisting Moscow\u2019s relentless invasion.But more than a year into the war, there are growing differences behind the scenes between Washington and Kyiv on war aims, and potential flashpoints loom on how, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":7361,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1154],"tags":[3189,3188],"class_list":["post-7359","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trending","tag-breakdown-in-u-s-ukraine-relations","tag-small-rift"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7359","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7359"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7359\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7360,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7359\/revisions\/7360"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/7361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7359"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7359"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7359"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}