The House Ethics Committee voted to investigate embattled New York Rep. George Santos over several allegations surrounding his campaign last year and time in office.
\nThe evenly split bipartisan panel voted unanimously Feb. 28 to establish a subcommittee of two Republicans and two Democrats who will look into whether Santos engaged in “unlawful activity” during his 2022 campaign and investigate sexual misconduct allegations involving a staffer.
\nThe announcement came the same day a nonpartisan ethics watchdog group filed another Federal Election Commission complaint against the Long Island Republican.
\nThe latest developments are causing more trouble for the freshman lawmaker who has stepped down from his committee assignments after he admitted “embellishing” his resume, including lying about his academic credentials. He has steadfastly refused\u2002to leave Congress despite calls for his resignation from both parties and his admission to being a “terrible liar.”
\nRep. David Joyce, R-Ohio, will serve as chair of the subcommittee with Rep. Susan Wild, D-Pa., as the top Democratic member. Republican Rep. John Rutherford of Florida and Democratic Rep. Glenn Ivey of Maryland will also serve on the panel.
\nSpeaker of the House Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., said in January he would consider removing\u2002Santos from Congress if an investigation into his background by the ethics committee finds he acted illegally.
\n\u201cIf for some way when we go through ethics and he has broken the law, then we will remove him, but it’s not my role,\u201d McCarthy said. “I believe in the rule of law. A person’s innocent until proven guilty.”
\nAlso on Thursday, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust filed a complaint with the FEC\u2002seeking a probe into whether Santos’ campaign committee violated federal campaign law by failing to disclose expenditures.
\nThis isn’t the first group that has flagged possible campaign violations by the congressman’s campaign.
\nLiberal political action committee End Citizens United filed three complaints with the FEC related to Santos’ finances. Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., and the Campaign Legal Center also\u2002requested investigations\u2002from the FEC into his campaign funds.
\nFACT claims Santos’ has over $350,000 in unexplained spending from his 2022 congressional campaign. The group says there is no record where the hundreds of thousands of dollars went.
\nIt is required by federal law to disclose campaign expenditures and money raised or spent during an election for federal office.
\nThe complaint filed Thursday also alleges that the Santos campaign had nearly 1,300 disbursements to “anonymous” that totaled over $250,000 and were later removed from reports. The nonprofit said these disbursements were for $199.99 \u2013 one penny below the FEC’s threshold requiring disbursements to be itemized.
\nOne complaint filed by End Citizens United in February alleges a\u2002staffer from\u2002George Santos’\u2002campaign\u2002posed as\u2002a top aide to\u2002House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy to raise campaign funds \u2013 and kept up the front over the course of two campaign cycles.
\nThe political action committee, which focuses on money in politics, filed an additional complaint in January with the FEC that alleged Santos\u2002used a shell corporation\u2002to fund more than $700,000 in loans that he gave to his campaign. The group also filed complaints against Santos with the Department of Justice and Office of Congressional Ethics.<\/p>\n
Usatoday<\/p>\n
Tags\uff1aGOP Rep<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The House Ethics Committee voted to investigate embattled New York Rep. George Santos over several allegations surrounding his campaign last year and time in office. The evenly split bipartisan panel voted unanimously Feb. 28 to establish a subcommittee of two Republicans and two Democrats who will look into whether Santos engaged in “unlawful activity” during his 2022 campaign and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":6805,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[2706,2707],"class_list":["post-6804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-ethics","tag-panel"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6804"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6804\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6806,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6804\/revisions\/6806"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6805"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}