House lawmakers are bracing for the next wave of expulsions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Former Reps. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) and Tony Gonzales (R-Texas) avoided the boot only by quitting their seats in the face of allegations of sexual misconduct with staffers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Now, the expulsion battle is poised to enter its second round, as lawmakers in both parties eye plans to remove Florida Reps. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D) and Cory Mills (R), who are both accused of violating campaign finance laws, among other offenses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIf they\u2019re doing this s\u2011\u2011\u2011, then they need to go,\u201d Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The debate is set to erupt Tuesday, when the Ethics Committee is scheduled to make its disciplinary recommendations in the case of Cherfilus-McCormick, who is accused of stealing millions of dollars in Federal Emergency Management Agency funds to help finance her campaign. The Justice Department filed federal charges last November, and an Ethics subcommittee earlier this month found she violated 25 rules of congressional standards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Cherfilus-McCormick has denied any wrongdoing, saying she\u2019s the victim of a partisan witch hunt by the Trump administration. But even many Democrats are ready to push her out the door given the Ethics findings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe Ethics Committee has the material,\u201d Rep. Teresa Leger Fern\u00e1ndez (D-N.M.) said. \u201cSo I think it needs to move quickly.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWe\u2019re moving if the Ethics Committee brings it to the floor,\u201d echoed another Democratic lawmaker, who requested anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yet those same Democrats are also demanding the expulsion of Mills, who is the subject of a separate Ethics investigation into allegations of \u201cdating violence,\u201d campaign finance violations and using his perch in Congress to steer business to the weapons and defense companies he continues to operate. (He has denied the charges.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Democrats are arguing the importance of parity: Like offenses demand like consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But the unspoken political dynamic underlying the debate is that, in a House with razor-thin margins, neither party wants to advantage the other by expelling only one of their own \u2014 a concern that\u2019s generated support for the idea of pairing the removals. That was the case with Swalwell and Gonzales, and now it\u2019s the case with Cherfilus-McCormick and Mills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The complication with that strategy is that the Ethics Committee is much further along with the investigation into Cherfilus-McCormick, which formally launched in December 2023, than it is with the probe into Mills, which was initiated in November 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Ethics sanctions for Cherfilus-McCormick will be formalized Tuesday. Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) has already filed his expulsion resolution. And Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has made clear he thinks she\u2019ll be quickly removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe facts are indisputable at this point, and so I believe it\u2019ll be the consensus of this body that she should be expelled,\u201d Johnson told reporters this week. He was much less committal about Mills, saying only that he wanted to see more details from the Ethics investigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The different timetables have created a dilemma for Democratic leaders, who are running on a midterm message of anti-corruption and want to be seen honoring the conclusions of the Ethics Committee, a rare panel on which membership is split evenly between the parties. So far, they\u2019ve declined to say how they\u2019ll approach a vote to expel Cherfilus-McCormick.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI trust the members on the Ethics Committee who have done the work and dug in here and respect their decision on this,\u201d House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) told reporters Thursday. \u201cWe will react when they put something out.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Yet Democrats are also pressing hard to ensure that, if Cherfilus-McCormick is expelled, Mills is treated similarly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhy the hell are we waiting so long for Cory Mills?\u201d Leger Fern\u00e1ndez asked. \u201cThis is sexual violence he\u2019s been accused of, and there seem to be incredibly credible reports. Let\u2019s get that before us.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Leger Fern\u00e1ndez, the head of the Democratic Women\u2019s Caucus, had joined Luna in leading the charge to oust Swalwell and Gonzales before they resigned. She suggested she\u2019s ready to support the expulsion of Cherfilus-McCormick, based on the Ethics recommendations, but also wants assurances that the House has an opportunity to vote on Mills\u2019s removal, even if the two resolutions are not directly linked.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI don\u2019t know that they have to come up together, [but] they need to come up,\u201d she said. \u201cAnd they need to come up quickly. Because we\u2019re tired of it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The debate has led lawmakers in both parties to air frustrations at the pace of the Ethics panel \u2014 and to call for reforms to expedite the process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThey need an overhaul in Ethics and, like, get rid of all of them, change the chair, all of it,\u201d Luna said. \u201cI don\u2019t want to prevent any due process from taking place, but I think that it needs to be sped up.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rep. Michael Guest (R-Miss.), the chair of the Ethics Committee, is defending the panel, saying the investigations the group takes on can be of such a complex nature that they demand months or years to work through.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI promise the American public, and the members of this body, that the members of the Ethics Committee \u2014 the staff of the investigation, the investigative staff of the committee \u2014 that we\u2019re working diligently to move these cases through as quickly as possible,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He declined to comment on the timeline for the probe into Mills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mills, for his part, is well aware of the uproar surrounding his conduct. But he\u2019s maintained his innocence, noting that he\u2019s never been arrested, even following a police investigation into a physical altercation between himself and a girlfriend in Washington. In the same vein, he characterized another of the episodes under investigation \u2014 which involves revenge porn accusations that led a former girlfriend to obtain a restraining order \u2014 as \u201ca bad breakup.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIt\u2019s just interesting, kind-of seeing how you\u2019re guilty by accusation as opposed to the way the rule of law truly works,\u201d Mills told NewsNation, The Hill\u2019s broadcast partner in Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Still, it\u2019s not only Democrats who are eyeing Mills\u2019s ouster. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), a loud advocate for abused women, has been pushing a resolution for months to censure Mills, and now she\u2019s also calling for him to resign or be expelled. And the idea appears to be gaining traction, especially among GOP women.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe most concerning thing to me is the allegation of assaulting a woman,\u201d Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) said. \u201cThat\u2019s pretty upsetting.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n