Democrats running to be Michigan\u2019s next U.S. senator tangled Wednesday over who is best suited for the job, with campaign contributions from corporate political action committees emerging as a dividing line during a forum hosted by the United Auto Workers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Responding to a question from a laborer concerned about the influence of corporate money in government, two of the three candidates \u2014 physician Abdul El-Sayed and state Sen. Mallory McMorrow \u2014 said their campaigns are not accepting such donations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The third, Rep. Haley Stevens, whose Senate bid has been funded in part by corporate PACs representing Ford Motor Co., General Motors, Walmart and others, sidestepped the question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Instead, Stevens focused on her desire to \u201cend Citizens United,\u201d the 2010 Supreme Court ruling that loosened campaign finance restrictions and has become a rallying point for Democrats. As the forum continued, a \u201crapid response\u201d email circulated by Stevens\u2019 campaign emphasized her support for \u201clegislation to reduce the influence of big money in politics and implement anti-corruption measures.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cLook, friends, I\u2019m not a millionaire, and I don\u2019t own stock,\u201d Stevens said. \u201cI\u2019m running my campaign in a grassroots way, where 95% of my donations are $200 or less. They\u2019re coming from grocery clerk workers, nurses, folks on the factory line. I cannot be bought.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
McMorrow, whose earlier state campaigns received corporate PAC money, called out Stevens for not offering a \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cno\u201d answer, after the discussion shifted to pension benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cAs we talk about our retirement, we need to know who our next senator is working for,\u201d McMorrow said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The topic of corporate money in politics yielded one of the most pronounced contrasts in a forum that showcased the three leading Democrats\u2019 different principles and ideologies, as well as their unified support for organized labor. The event, part of the UAW\u2019s biannual Community Action Program conference in Washington, D.C., marked the first time the trio shared a stage together, providing each an opportunity to audition for union workers whose votes will be crucial in Michigan, the epicenter of the U.S. auto industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Former Rep. Mike Rogers, the top Republican contender for the Senate seat, declined an invitation to participate, UAW officials said. He was represented on stage by an empty chair. A spokesperson for Rogers did not respond to a request for comment. In a social media post later Wednesday, Rogers disputed the claim that he had received an invitation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Samantha Cantrell, a spokesperson for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, issued a statement accusing El-Sayed, McMorrow and Stevens of supporting environmental policies that would be harmful to the state\u2019s economy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThey are not the champions of Michigan\u2019s auto industry they are pretending to be,\u201d Cantrell said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The seat is open after Sen. Gary Peters, a Democrat, decided against seeking a third term. The Aug. 4 primary is one of a handful of midterm year races that has commanded national interest and will help clarify the direction of a Democratic Party struggling with its identity. Recent polls show a competitive primary, with no candidate running away from the pack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWe are going to fight,\u201d LaShawn English, the UAW Region 1 director, told the audience before the debate. \u201cBut we need our politicians, our political leaders, to fight hard for us, our members, just like the UAW fights for us. The outcome of this year\u2019s midterm election and the 2028 election will go a long way towards fighting the path for working-class citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
El-Sayed has positioned himself on the party\u2019s left wing and has endorsements from Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and other leading progressives. He repeatedly mentioned Wednesday that he has never taken money from corporate PACs, a stance dating to his unsuccessful run for Michigan\u2019s Democratic nomination for governor in 2018 \u2014 and a contrast with Stevens and McMorrow. El-Sayed also emphasized his support for Medicare for All, though he recently clarified his stance after McMorrow criticized his position as confusing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThis is about an opportunity to think different about the world we actually want to achieve,\u201d El-Sayed said in his closing remarks Wednesday. \u201cSo if you want to continue to do the same, I\u2019m not your guy. But if you want someone who\u2019s going to fight tooth and nail around the things that got me into medicine in the first place, maybe I am.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Stevens practices more moderate politics and is closely aligned with the party\u2019s establishment, boasting support from former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. She focused her attacks at the forum on Rogers and President Donald Trump, linking the two together while looking past her primary rivals. She also emphasized her work in the Obama administration on the Great Recession-era rescue plan for Detroit\u2019s Big Three automakers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cMy line is always open to each and every single one of you,\u201d Stevens told the audience. \u201cThis race is about the future of Michigan. We\u2019re not going to let Mike Rogers trample on our rights to organize. We\u2019re not going to let Mike Rogers go along and clink his martini glass and pretend to be Donald Trump\u2019s best friend.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
McMorrow, who is backed by Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., has presented her campaign as something of a middle ground between El-Sayed and Stevens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cYou have three good choices on the stage,\u201d said McMorrow, striking a conciliatory note before moving onto subtle contrasts. \u201cWe do not have to settle for somebody who prioritizes rhetoric over results, who\u2019s never held office, who\u2019s never delivered for you. We don\u2019t have to settle for somebody who\u2019s too beholden to corporate interests to actually work alongside you.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
McMorrow also announced new legislation she had introduced in the state Senate that would prohibit companies that receive state tax incentives from offering stock buybacks \u2014 a measure she said would benefit workers over shareholders. Her proposal drew a rebuke from El-Sayed, who used it as an opportunity to flex a more progressive posture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI don\u2019t think it should be conditional on whether or not you got a tax incentive, because I actually think those tax incentives are bunk,\u201d he said. \u201cI think we should ban stock buybacks outright.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
While much of the forum focused specifically on economic and labor issues, the event\u2019s first question centered on voting rights and Trump\u2019s recent suggestion that Republicans should nationalize elections and take them over from states. Detroit is among the cities Trump has called out by name and accused, without evidence, of corruption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
All three Democrats pledged to champion voting rights while emphasizing what they have already done to push back on Trump and Republicans. Stevens noted bills she has supported in Congress, McMorrow bills she has backed in the Legislature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
El-Sayed talked about a recent trip to Minneapolis, where the Trump administration\u2019s immigration enforcement operations are under scrutiny after federal officers killed two U.S. citizens. He said he believes such tactics could be used in any effort to nationalize elections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhen you look at ICE on our streets, what do you think they\u2019re setting up for?\u201d El-Sayed said. \u201cSo I\u2019ve come out and said that we have to abolish ICE. It is not enough for us to continue to step by and think that this is about immigration enforcement. It is not. It is about normalizing paramilitary force to take away our rights.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n