A federal judge Thursday dealt a significant legal setback to the Trump administration in its efforts to obtain voter data held by states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a 33-page order, U.S. District Judge David O. Carter in California dismissed a lawsuit that sought to give the Justice Department access to the Democratic-led state\u2019s voter files, including records like Social Security numbers and driver\u2019s license information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
California is one of 23 states, along with Washington, D.C., that the Justice Department has sued for refusing to hand over the voter data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The lawsuit against California was filed in September.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cClean voter rolls are the foundation of free and fair elections,\u201d Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement at the time. \u201cEvery state has a responsibility to ensure that voter registration records are accurate, accessible, and secure \u2014 states that don\u2019t fulfill that obligation will see this Department of Justice in court.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The judge, a Clinton appointee, slammed those efforts in his ruling Thursday, writing that the administration’s request \u201cthreatens the right to vote which is the cornerstone of American democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe Department of Justice seeks to use civil rights legislation which was enacted for an entirely different purpose to amass and retain an unprecedented amount of confidential voter data,” Carter wrote. “The centralization of this information by the federal government would have a chilling effect on voter registration which would inevitably lead to decreasing voter turnout as voters fear that their information is being used for some inappropriate or unlawful purpose.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups involved in the case praised the ruling in a joint statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe court has recognized the fundamental importance of protecting voters\u2019 sensitive personal information and dismissed this illegal federal overreach,” the statement said. “Voters should never have to choose between their privacy and their fundamental right to vote.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“Today\u2019s ruling affirms that the federal government is not entitled to unfettered access to private voter data,\u201d they added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In a separate case, a federal judge in Oregon said Wednesday that he was tentatively planning to dismiss the Justice Department\u2019s lawsuit in that state but that he would issue his final decision in a written opinion in the near future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n