The top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee said Sunday that surveillance video of U.S. military strikes targeting an alleged drug trafficking vessel in the Caribbean Sea on Sept. 2 would contradict how Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and other Republicans have described it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhen they [the survivors] were finally taken out, they weren\u2019t trying to flip the boat over. The boat was clearly incapacitated. A tiny portion of it remained, capsized, the bow of the boat. They had no communications device. Certainly, they were unarmed,\u201d Rep. Adam Smith, one of the Democratic lawmakers who saw the video, said. \u201cAny claim that the drugs had somehow survived that attack is hard, hard to really square with what we saw.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Smith called the video \u201cdeeply disturbing\u201d and said \u201cit did not appear that these two survivors were in any position to continue the fight.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n
That\u2019s counter to how Hegseth and Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee who also viewed the video, have described the circumstances preceding the second strike. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Cotton told reporters he had no doubt about the legality of the strike and said he \u201csaw two survivors trying to flip a boat loaded with drugs bound for the United States back over so they could stay in the fight.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On Saturday, Hegseth recounted what he had been told about the subsequent strike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI was told, \u2018hey, there had to be a reattack, because there were a couple folks who could still be in the fight. Access to radios. There was a link up point of another potential boat, drugs were still there. They were actively interacting with them,\u2019\u201d the secretary said at the Reagan National Defense Forum.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Asked by \u201cThis Week\u201d anchor George Stephanopoulos about Hegseth’s comments, Smith said, \u201cThat’s ridiculous. There are no radios.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThey ought to release the video,\u201d Smith said. \u201cIf they release the video, then everything that the Republicans are saying will clearly be portrayed to be completely false. And people will get a look at it, and they will see. The boat was adrift. It was going where the current was going to take it, and these two were trying to figure out how to survive.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n President Donald Trump has said the administration would have \u201cno problem\u201d releasing the video of the strike in question, but Hegseth was noncommittal when asked Saturday. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhatever we were to decide to release, we’d have to be very responsible about it so we\u2019re reviewing that right now.,\u201d Hegseth said at the Reagan National Defense Forum. \u201cI’m way more interested in protecting that than anything else. So, we’re viewing the process, and we’ll see.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Smith argued the strike video lawmakers were shown is \u201cno different\u201d than the strike videos the administration has already publicly released. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt seems pretty clear they don’t want to release this video because they don’t want people to see it, because it’s very, very difficult to justify,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Sen. Eric Schmitt, a Republican member of the Armed Services Committee who has not seen the video, defended the administration in a separate interview on \u201cThis Week.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe fact is, these cartels now, because the southern border is closed, they’ve gone to the high seas. So President Trump is acting with his core Article II powers. No serious legal expert would doubt that the president has authority to blow narco-terrorists out of the water,\u201d Schmitt said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The Missouri senator continued, \u201cPresident Trump has been delegated the authority by Congress to designate terrorist organizations. He’s done that. He sent a letter to Congress saying he was going to initiate these strikes. We’ve had regular briefings about it.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Schmitt argued the criticism from Democrats amounts to \u201cpolitics and trying to take out Secretary Hegseth.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n On Saturday, Hegseth said designating cartels as terrorist organizations makes them a \u201ctarget\u201d just like al-Qaida. But the legality of the entire operation targeting these vessels has been a central debate, and legal experts have questioned the administration’s justification. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIf you say anyone who has drugs that they’re intending to illegally transit to the U.S. is a legitimate target for deadly force, the amount of power that gives the president and the U.S. military is unprecedented, and something that ought to be concerning to all of the American people,\u201d Smith, the top Armed Services Democrat, said on \u201cThis Week.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n Schmitt, however, insisted the strikes are legal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThey’re completely authorized. I reviewed the 40-plus page memo by the Office of Legal Counsel. There’s [Judge Advocates General] officers in these rooms, George, every time there’s a strike,\u201d Schmitt said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The opinion by the Justice Department\u2019s Office of Legal Counsel has not been made public. Democrats have called for it to be released.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Schmitt was also asked about Trump\u2019s decision to pardon Juan Orlando Hernandez, the former president of Honduras, who was serving a 45-year sentence in the United States on multiple counts of drug and weapons trafficking in 2024. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cDo you support this pardon of the former Honduran president?\u201d Stephanopoulos asked Schmitt. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI’m not familiar with the facts or circumstances, but I think what’s telling here is to try to imply that somehow President Trump is soft on, on drug smuggling is just ridiculous,\u201d Schmitt said. “It’s totally ridiculous. He’s the \u2013 he’s provided border security like we’ve never seen before.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n But pressed by Stephanopoulos on whether he supported the pardon, Schmitt said that the discussion about Hernandez was a distraction from the administration\u2019s military campaign against alleged drug trafficking in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWhat we’re talking about here are the narco-terrorists poisoning Americans,\u201d Schmitt said. \u201cThis attempt to try to focus on a pardon is classic because you’ve lost the debate now on the narco-terrorist question.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n But Smith said that he believed the pardon was part of the administration\u2019s bid to exert additional control on South American politics. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIt’s more about what Trump released with their national security strategy a couple days ago, three days ago now, where he wants to assert dominance over the Western hemisphere,\u201d Smith said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Honduras thing seems to have to do with the presidential election that’s going on down there and the party that supports Trump or the party that doesn’t support Trump,\u201d he added. “So, it seems to be much more about that than any legitimate desire to stop what, by the way, is a huge problem; drugs in the U.S. are a huge problem.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n