Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse on Monday are demanding answers from Meta on the social media giant\u2019s decision to reinstate\u00a0former President Donald Trump\u2002to Facebook and Instagram, slamming the move as “inexplicable.”
\nMeta,\u2002last week, announced it would end Trump\u2019s suspension across its platforms, which began after the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021.
\nIn a blog post, Nick Clegg, president of global affairs at Meta, said Trump\u2019s suspension would be lifted “in the coming weeks.”
\nBut Schiff, D-Calif., and Whitehouse, D-R.I., are slamming Meta for its decision, saying the former president should not be reinstated.
\n“Based on Meta\u2019s previous statements on standards for allowing Trump back on the platform, his account should not have been reinstated,” Schiff and Whitehouse wrote in a letter to Clegg Monday, claiming that Trump has “continued to post harmful election content on Truth Social that would likely violate Facebook\u2019s policies, and we have every reason to believe he will bring similar conspiratorial rhetoric back to Facebook, too.”
\nThey added: “How Facebook could reinstate his account, given all the additional content on Truth Social that would likely have resulted in a brand-new suspension if it were on your platform, is inexplicable.”
\nSchiff and Whitehouse also asked Meta to provide a briefing on the company\u2019s efforts to “uphold election integrity and not allow their platform to be used to spread conspiracy theories and election lies.”
\n“[W]e believe that part of Meta\u2019s commitment to election integrity should be ensuring that those who maintain the unfounded, dangerous narrative of the 2020 election are not allowed or encouraged to spread the lie in any form,” they wrote.
\n“It is not clear in this decision where Meta will draw the line \u2018between content that is harmful and should be removed, and content that, however distasteful or inaccurate, is part of the rough and tumble of life in a free society\u2019 and we would greatly appreciate further clarity on this matter.”
\nThe social media company first moved to block Trump following the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. That decision was\u00a0upheld\u00a0by the platform’s Oversight Board in May 2021, though the board asked Facebook to re-examine Trump’s then-“indefinite” suspension and “decide the appropriate penalty.”
\nIn June 2021, Meta Platforms determined it would do a suspension on his Facebook and Instagram accounts for\u00a0two years\u00a0ending in January 2023, at which point the company would reassess the former president’s status.
\n“In light of his [Trump’s] violations, he now faces heightened penalties for repeat offenses \u2013 penalties which will apply to\u00a0other public figures\u00a0whose accounts are reinstated from suspensions related to civil unrest under our updated protocol,” Clegg said in the blog post last week.
\nClegg acknowledged that “reasonable people” will have varying opinions on Meta’s decision to allow Trump back on its platforms.
\n“But a decision had to be made, so we have tried to make it as best we can in a way that is consistent with our values and the process we established in response to the Oversight Board’s guidance.”<\/p>\n