A White House vow to dismantle left-wing organizations may be easier issued than implemented, according to experts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThere\u2019s not a lot of federal law on this,\u201d said Scott Walter, president of the Capital Research Center, a Washington-based nonprofit organization that tracks progressive groups and is influential in conservative circles. \u201cFrankly, the states and localities should be doing a better job [of prosecuting criminal activity], as they did in the 1960s. They have enormously more manpower.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
His point hints at the challenge administration officials have as they try to respond to anger over the Sept. 10 assassination of prominent conservative activist Charlie Kirk with a concrete plan of action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
White House officials, including President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, have accused left-wing groups of fomenting political violence in the wake of a killing that shocked the nation and left the president\u2019s MAGA base with a mix of grief, fear and fury.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A White House spokesperson responded to requests for comment on reports of plans to target such organizations with clips of a Trump interview on Fox News, including one in which he accused groups on the left of \u201cincitement to riot.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On Wednesday, Trump declared that he had designated antifa, a decentralized set of extreme left-wing groups, as a \u201cmajor terrorist organization.\u201d But there is no domestic equivalent of a \u201cforeign terrorist organization\u201d \u2014 a label administrations use to sanction non-state American adversaries overseas \u2014 in federal law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHe can say what he wants, but it has no legal significance,\u201d said Mary McCord, the former top national security official at the Justice Department. \u201cTo create a designation process for domestic organizations that would trigger any legal ramifications, you would need Congress to create a statute creating that process. Theoretically he could try to do things through executive orders, but that\u2019s not going to trigger any of the current criminal material support [for foreign terrorist organization] charges.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Trump made a similar proclamation about antifa during his first term in office, and former Attorney General William Barr asked the FBI to develop a strategy to investigate left-wing organizations. That led the FBI to enlist members of the far-right group the Proud Boys as confidential human sources, some of whom later entered the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In January, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., proposed labeling antifa a terrorist organization. But her House resolution, which has not advanced, would not have the force of law. Greene did not reply to a text message seeking comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Authorities have not publicly identified any link between antifa and Kirk\u2019s death. When Utah prosecutors charged Tyler Robinson with murdering Kirk, the documents they filed in court this week did not identify him as a member of any group.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 2020, then-FBI Director Christopher Wray said that while antifa was \u201ca real thing,\u201d it was \u201cnot a group or an organization. It\u2019s a movement or an ideology.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jon Lewis, a research fellow at the Program on Extremism at George Washington University, said: \u201cIt\u2019s fairly obvious and there\u2019s a general consensus in the research community that antifa is not an organization, lacks any coherent membership structure, and most importantly it\u2019s not foreign. In a period where there is significant political violence, there is at least increased concern around putting a target on the back of anyone who can be tarred with the brush of being antifa.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Despite the claims of prominent allies of the president, Lewis pointed out that studies show that right-wing violence is a much deadlier threat in recent history than left-wing violence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Federal authorities may probe groups they suspect have spurred riots and attacks on law enforcement officers, groups that illegally make personal information public or groups that are responsible for \u201cdrop points for weapons and material,\u201d according to an administration official. That could result in more prosecutions under existing laws, but Congress would still have to act to make a wider range of activity illegal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
White House officials and outside groups appear to have homed in on a still-developing plan to target the tax-exempt status of groups that fund liberal activism, including the Open Society Foundations, which was founded by billionaire George Soros, and the Ford Foundation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cDo you know they benefit from generous treatment? They are literally subsidized by you and me, the American taxpayer,\u201d Vance said when he guest-hosted \u201cThe Charlie Kirk Show\u201d on Monday. \u201cAnd how do they reward us? By setting fire to the house built by the American family over 250 years.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Federal law prohibits the president and the vice president from ordering investigations into organizations\u2019 tax status.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 2017, during Trump\u2019s first term, the Justice Department settled a lawsuit with conservative groups that claimed they had been unfairly put under an IRS microscope when they applied for tax exemptions when Barack Obama, a Democrat, was president.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Trump\u2019s rhetoric has sent a chill through the liberal political sphere, activists said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Angelo Greco, a progressive operative who advises groups that have not been mentioned by Trump \u2014 including Our Revolution, One Fair Wage, Reproductive Freedom for All and Black Women\u2019s Roundtable \u2014 said past threats from administration officials to go after liberal nonprofit groups have given them time to prepare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhat\u2019s different now is that I didn\u2019t think the temperature could reach a boiling point, but we\u2019re there,\u201d Greco said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Left-leaning advocacy groups are rethinking contingency plans, including \u201cchanging their name, revising their mission or operating differently,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Joseph Geevarghese, the executive director of Our Revolution, a group founded by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., after his 2016 presidential campaign that is focused on electing progressive lawmakers and advancing left-wing economic causes, said it\u2019s still far too soon to know how the promised crackdown would affect progressive advocacy organizations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He said his organization was less likely to be hampered by the effort, though, because it does not rely on any major donors and it is focused on economic issues rather than cultural touch points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Geevarghese said he has heard from some grassroots activists that there is increased concern about taking part in protests or other group action. But he said: \u201cWe\u2019re going to continue doing what we do.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Walter, the president of the Capital Research Center, whose group has briefed the White House on nonprofit organizations\u2019 voter registration efforts that it sees as partisan, said that despite the challenges, he is hopeful that the administration can take effective actions against left-wing groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI\u2019m more optimistic than I\u2019ve ever been, but it is definitely an uphill battle to make progress,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
To do that, he added, the White House should focus on sources of funding, including tax exemptions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cI hope the administration will come up with serious strategic ways of dealing with these things,\u201d he said. \u201cThe larger problem, namely all the radicalization, needs to be looked at strategically.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n