Nationals from countries including Afghanistan, Haiti and Sudan \u2018fully\u2019 restricted as those of seven other countries partially restricted<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Donald Trump has signed a sweeping order banning travel from 12 countries and restricting travel from seven others, reviving and expanding the travel bans from his first term.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be \u201cfully\u201d restricted from entering the US, according to the proclamation. Meanwhile, the entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The US president said that he \u201cconsidered foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism goals\u201d in deciding the scope of the ban. Trump had cued up the ban in an executive order<\/a> signed on 20 January, his first day back in the White House, instructing his administration to submit a list of candidates for a ban by 21 March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump has cited a range of justifications for the bans, including national security and concerns that visitors from those countries are overstaying their visas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But advocates and experts have said that blanket travel bans discriminate against groups of people based on ethnicity alone. They will likely result \u2013 as the travels bans did during Trump\u2019s first term \u2013 in the separation of families. The bans on travel from Haiti, Cuba and Venezuela could be especially impactful in US communities with huge immigrant populations from those countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThis discriminatory policy, which limits legal immigration, not only flies in the face of what our country is supposed to stand for, it will be harmful to our economy and communities that rely on the contributions of people who come to America from this wide range of countries,\u201d said Pramila Jayapal, a Democratic representative of Washington.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The decision to ban travel from these countries comes amid a wave of hardline immigration policies that Trump has issued, including the blocking of asylum claims at the southern border and cancelling temporary protected status for immigrants from a number of countries facing deep humanitarian crises. Trump has also signed a proclamation to restrict foreign student visas at Harvard University<\/a> and ordered US consulates to conduct social media screening of every visa applicant seeking to travel to the university.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In a video message released on social media, Trump said he was making good on a promise to act following the recent attack at a Boulder, Colorado, event<\/a> showing support for Israeli hostages. The attack by an Egyptian national \u201cunderscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don\u2019t want them,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump added that the list was \u201csubject to revisions based on whether material improvements are made\u201d and that \u201clikewise, new countries could be added as threats emerge around the world\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Having instituted a travel ban<\/a> on Muslim countries early in his first term, Trump trailed his plans for a new ban during his election campaign against Kamala Harris last year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI will ban refugee resettlement from terror-infested areas like the Gaza Strip, and we will seal our border and bring back the travel ban,\u201d Trump said<\/a> in September. \u201cRemember the famous travel ban? We didn\u2019t take people from certain areas of the world. We\u2019re not taking them from infested countries.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n He was referring to the ban he imposed after taking office in January 2017, leading to chaos at airports<\/a> as protesters and civil rights attorneys rushed to help affected travelers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Trump said the ban was needed to combat terrorist threats. It was blocked by federal courts<\/a> on civil liberties grounds but the US supreme court, to which Trump would eventually appoint three hardline rightwing justices, allowed<\/a> the ban to stand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The supreme court said Trump\u2019s ban did not target Muslims \u2013 despite the fact it originally targeted travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, Muslim-majority countries. According to the court, the ban fell within the remit of a president\u2019s national security powers<\/a>. North Korea and Venezuela were also included<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair) said then: \u201cThe Muslim ban\u2019s bigotry should have been as clear to the supreme court as it is to the Muslims demonized by it. Apparently, everyone but the supreme court can see the decision for what it is: an expression of animosity.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 2020, shortly before the Covid pandemic drastically reduced world travel, Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Nigeria, Myanmar, Tanzania and Sudan were added<\/a> to the ban.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In 2021, that travel ban was among measures Joe Biden ended<\/a> within hours of being sworn in as Trump\u2019s White House successor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n