Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., faced intense questioning from people at a town hall Tuesday, at one point conceding that he did not read a provision in the House\u2019s \u201cBig Beautiful Bill\u201d before he voted for it, triggering loud protests from the audience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The town hall was held in a high school in Seward, Nebraska, and livestreamed on YouTube by News Channel Nebraska \u2014 a media network founded and owned by Flood<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Flood admitted he did not read the full bill<\/a> when an audience member asked him why he had voted in favor of a provision that would make it harder for judges to enforce orders holding parties before them in contempt for defying court orders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Flood, who holds a law degree from the University of Nebraska, said that he did not agree with the provision and that he was unaware of it when he voted in favor of the bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI believe in the rule of law. I\u2019ve taken an oath as an attorney, I\u2019ve taken an oath as a state senator, I\u2019ve taken an oath as a member of Congress, and I support our court system, and I do believe that the federal district courts, when issuing an injunction, should have legal effect. In fact, I relied upon that when the Biden administration was in place. The federal courts did a tremendous amount of good work,\u201d Flood said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThis provision was unknown to me when I voted for the bill,\u201d he finished, to loud yells from the crowd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As the moderator tried to move on to the next question, Flood stopped her, saying: \u201cI am not going to hide the truth. This provision was unknown to me when I voted for that, and when I found out that provision was in the bill, I immediately reached out to my Senate counterparts and told them of my concern.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Flood\u2019s words did not calm attendees, who continued their shouting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The questions only got more intense from there, with attendees grilling him on a number of topics, from Medicaid cuts to his voting record to changes in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Flood won handily in Seward County, winning re-election with 77.6%<\/a> of the county\u2019s votes in November \u2014 higher than President Donald Trump, who won 72.2% in the county. Flood won his district with 60.1% of the vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Nebraska Democratic Party encouraged followers<\/a> Tuesday to \u201cpack the place\u201d and ask Flood questions at the town hall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n One person accused Flood of being a \u201cfascist\u201d and asked him whether he would be willing to invoke articles of impeachment against Trump.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Flood denied the accusation, saying, \u201cI get that you get an applause line when you call me a fascist, but I\u2019m not. I am not a fascist, I\u2019m an American, and I would never call you something like that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yet another person accused him of lying over promises to protect health care but voting in favor of the “Big Beautiful Bill,” which could trigger cuts. The bill would slash<\/a> hundreds of billions of dollars for Medicaid and SNAP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In response, Flood said Nebraska does not provide benefits to undocumented immigrants, arguing that the bill\u2019s cuts would target that group of people and not his state. Minutes later, Flood turned the question on the crowd, asking, \u201cQuestion for the audience, do you want illegal immigrants to get tax-funded benefits?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n The crowd answered with a loud \u201cYes.\u201d Flood replied: \u201cI would say that is not the majority opinion of most Nebraskans, however. Next question.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Flood hosted a town hall in Columbus, Nebraska, in March<\/a>, when he also faced criticism. Several of Flood\u2019s colleagues have faced tough questions since Trump returned to office at the beginning of the year, leading Republican congressional leadership in March to advise GOP members not to hold<\/a> in-person town halls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A spokesperson for Flood did not immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n