Nearly every House Democrat\u00a0on Wednesday voted against legislation that would require immediate medical attention for babies who are born alive after an attempt was made to abort them.
\nThe House passed the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which says any infant born alive after an\u00a0attempted abortion\u00a0is a “legal person for all purposes under the laws of the United States.” Doctors would be required to care for those infants as a “reasonably diligent and conscientious health care practitioner would render to any other child born alive.”
\nThe bill passed 220-210, and all 210 of the “no” votes came from Democrats. Only one Democrat voted for the bill \u2014 Rep. Henry Cuellar of Texas \u2014 and one other Democrat, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez of Texas, voted “present.”
\nFollowing that level of care, doctors would be required admit those infants to a hospital for further care. Any violation of this standard would result in fines and imprisonment for up to five years, or both.
\nRepublicans argued on the floor that comments from Virginia\u2019s former Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam are an example of why the law needs to be clarified to protect newborn infants who survive abortions. Northam was talking about third-trimester abortions and appeared to indicate support for delivering babies that might still be alive before taking their life outside the womb.
\nREPUBLICANS TO CONDEMN PRO-CHOICE ACTIVIST VIOLENCE AFTER ROE ROLLBACK WITH RESOLUTION<\/p>\n
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and other House Democrats voted against a bill Wednesday requiring medical care for infants who survive abortion.\u00a0(Chip Somodevilla\/Getty Images)
\n“We all know in 2019, then-Gov. Northam of the state of Virginia stated this: ‘The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that\u2019s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,'” said\u00a0Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.
\n“The cavalier attitude he displayed towards human life is just wrong,” Jordan said. “It is simple. Infants born alive following an abortion are kids, are children. All newborns deserve the same level of care.”
\nNonetheless, Democrats overwhelmingly rejected the bill. Some, like Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., argued that the bill would set up new requirements that would “directly interfere with the doctors\u2019 medical judgment and dictate a medical standard of care that may not be appropriate in all circumstances.”
\nHe and other Democrats said the requirement to eventually take infants who survive abortion to a hospital may not be in the best interest of the family.
\nSeveral others rejected Republicans’ stated purpose for bringing up the bill and accused the GOP of trying to outlaw abortion, although the bill places no new limit on abortion.<\/p>\n