{"id":37547,"date":"2025-01-21T21:59:42","date_gmt":"2025-01-22T03:59:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=37547"},"modified":"2025-01-21T21:59:50","modified_gmt":"2025-01-22T03:59:50","slug":"trump-executive-order-leaves-tiktok-in-legal-limbo-for-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=37547","title":{"rendered":"Trump executive order leaves TikTok in legal limbo, for now"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Jan 21 (Reuters) &#8211;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/topic\/person\/donald-trump\/\"><u>U.S. President Donald Trump<\/u><\/a>&#8216;s executive order to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/technology\/tiktok-awaits-trump-reprieve-china-signals-open-deal-2025-01-20\/\"><u>restore access to TikTok<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;has created a thicket of new legal questions for the short-video platform, along with new tensions between the White House, members of Congress who want the platform banned, and tech companies caught in the middle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Legal experts said despite Trump&#8217;s order, service providers and app distributors such as Google&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/markets\/companies\/GOOGL.O\"><u>(GOOGL.O), opens new tab<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;and Apple&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/markets\/companies\/AAPL.O\"><u>(AAPL.O), opens new tab<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;still face major uncertainty and potential massive financial liability for defying&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/business\/media-telecom\/what-happens-after-tiktok-ban-2025-01-06\/\"><u>a law that banned TikTok<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;in the United States unless Chinese parent ByteDance divested the company by Jan. 19.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">TikTok remained&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/technology\/tiktok-app-unavailable-apple-google-stores-us-despite-trump-delaying-ban-2025-01-21\/\"><u>unavailable to download<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;on Apple and Android devices in the United States early Tuesday afternoon, after Trump signed an executive order on Monday seeking to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/technology\/tiktok-goes-dark-us-users-trump-says-save-tiktok-2025-01-19\/\"><u>pause the U.S. ban<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;as one of his first acts as president.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The order&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/presidential-actions\/2025\/01\/application-of-protecting-americans-from-foreign-adversary-controlled-applications-act-to-tiktok\/\"><u>directs, opens new tab<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;the U.S. Justice Department to delay for 75 days any enforcement of the divestment law,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/us\/senator-says-trump-cannot-ignore-law-requiring-bytedance-divest-tiktok-by-next-2024-11-19\/\"><u>passed by Congress last year<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Trump also directed the U.S. attorney general to send a letter to service providers such as app store hosts, saying there has been no prior violation of the law, and would be no liability during the review period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">University of Minnesota Law School professor Alan Rozenshtein said in a post at the national security publication Lawfare on Tuesday that the 75-day enforcement delay in Trump&#8217;s executive order &#8220;offers minimal security,&#8221; however, since courts do not see such promises as binding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">&#8220;Trump could change his mind at any time or selectively enforce against companies that fall from political favor,&#8221; Rozenshtein wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Google declined to comment, and Apple did not immediately respond to a request for one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The divestment law, which Congress passed with overwhelming bipartisan support amid national security concerns over Chinese influence, was signed by President Joe Biden and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/us-lawmakers-cheer-supreme-court-upholding-tiktok-ban-law-2025-01-17\/\"><u>upheld<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;by a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 17.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">It imposes a civil penalty on service providers of $5,000 per user for violations of the ban, creating billions of dollars of potential legal exposure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Executive orders cannot overturn laws enacted by Congress, and lawmakers have sued in the past to enforce laws they have passed. Legal experts said that even a hypothetical lawsuit from both houses of Congress could be a long shot, however, since courts might be inclined to see it as political question best left for the legislature, or a national security matter that falls under the White House&#8217;s control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The TikTok law does not lay out a right for private individuals to enforce it. But shareholders could sue service providers that cited Trump&#8217;s order to ignore the ban.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">&#8220;Shareholders of providers would have a valid case against companies that rely on the EO,&#8221; said cybersecurity and digital privacy expert Timothy Edgar, who teaches at Brown University. &#8220;It&#8217;s a huge gamble they are taking, given the extraordinary penalties the law provides.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/technology\/trump-executive-order-leaves-tiktok-legal-limbo-now-2025-01-21\/\">reuters<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jan 21 (Reuters) &#8211;&nbsp;U.S. President Donald Trump&#8216;s executive order to&nbsp;restore access to TikTok&nbsp;has created a thicket of new legal questions for the short-video platform, along with new tensions between the White House, members of Congress who want the platform banned, and tech companies caught in the middle. Legal experts said despite Trump&#8217;s order, service providers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":37548,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1155],"tags":[2849,1595,1230],"class_list":["post-37547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","tag-executive-order","tag-tiktok","tag-trump"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=37547"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37547\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37549,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37547\/revisions\/37549"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/37548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=37547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=37547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=37547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}