{"id":35592,"date":"2024-12-07T13:08:00","date_gmt":"2024-12-07T19:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=35592"},"modified":"2024-12-07T00:03:51","modified_gmt":"2024-12-07T06:03:51","slug":"connecticut-court-upholds-965-million-verdict-against-alex-jones-in-sandy-hook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=35592","title":{"rendered":"Connecticut court upholds $965 million verdict against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">HARTFORD, Conn. &#8212;&nbsp;The Connecticut Appellate Court on Friday affirmed a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/shootings-school-connecticut-conspiracy-alex-jones-3f579380515fdd6eb59f5bf0e3e1c08f\">$965 million verdict from 2022<\/a>&nbsp;against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, determining there&#8217;s \u201csufficient evidence\u201d to support the damages awarded to relatives of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre victims and an FBI agent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">In its unanimous opinion, the court cited the \u201ctraumatic threats and harassment\u201d the families endured \u201cstemming from the lies, as propagated by the defendants, that the Sandy Hook massacre was a hoax.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cOur review of the record reveals that there was sufficient evidence to support the $965,000,000 in compensatory damages awarded by the jury,\u201d according to the 62-page decision. It marks the largest jury verdict in Connecticut history.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The appellate court did grant Jones a $150 million reprieve. It determined the plaintiffs \u201cfailed to assert a legally viable\u201d claim under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act and that $150 million in punitive damages awarded by the lower court must be vacated, noting the plaintiffs alleged injury came from false language and not from speech related to advertising, marketing or the sale of goods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cWe\u2019re relieved that the Court protected the press with its decision reversing the damages in the unfair trade practices claim, but we are otherwise disappointed,&#8221; said Norm Pattis, Jones&#8217; attorney, in a statement. He said the jury in the case was \u201csold a bill of goods and led to believe\u201d Jones made millions spreading conspiracy theories about the Sandy Hook mass shooting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cHe didn\u2019t. The jury was also encouraged to believe that all the sorrow that befell the plaintiffs was Mr. Jones\u2019s fault. It wasn\u2019t.,&#8221; Pattis said. \u201cWe had hoped the Appellate Court would have seen through the charade and farce that this trial became. It didn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Jones now owes a total of roughly $1.2 billion, counting the $965 million to the Connecticut families and nearly $50 million awarded by a Texas jury to the parents of a Sandy Hook child who was killed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Jones filed for personal bankruptcy in 2022, and the sale of his Infowars platform is part of that case. A bid by The Onion satirical news outlet to buy Infowars is scheduled to return Monday to a Texas courtroom, where a judge will be deciding whether a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/onion-buys-infowars-alex-jones-6496f198d141c991087dcd937b3588e9\">bankruptcy auction<\/a>&nbsp;was properly run. Jones alleges collusion and fraud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Lawyers for the Sandy Hook families hailed the Connecticut appellate court&#8217;s ruling on Friday as an overall victory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">\u201cToday, Alex Jones\u2019s effort to overturn the jury\u2019s historic verdict against him and his corrupt business, Infowars, was unanimously rejected by the Connecticut Appellate Court. The jury\u2019s $965 million rebuke of Jones will stand, and the families who have fought valiantly for years have brought Alex Jones yet another step closer to true justice,\u201d the lawyers said in a statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Pattis said he will ask the Connecticut Supreme Court to review the appellate court decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Jones repeatedly told his millions of followers&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/hub\/sandy-hook-elementary-school-shooting\">the 2012 massacre that killed 20 first graders and six educators<\/a>&nbsp;was staged by \u201ccrisis actors\u201d to enact more gun control.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">The appellate court also determined that a lower court \u201cproperly exercised its discretion&#8221; in finding Jones and his Infowars&#8217; parent company Free Speech Systems LLC., liable for damages by default for failing to cooperate with court rules on sharing evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/US\/wireStory\/connecticut-court-upholds-965-million-verdict-alex-jones-116545069\">abcnews<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>HARTFORD, Conn. &#8212;&nbsp;The Connecticut Appellate Court on Friday affirmed a&nbsp;$965 million verdict from 2022&nbsp;against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, determining there&#8217;s \u201csufficient evidence\u201d to support the damages awarded to relatives of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre victims and an FBI agent. In its unanimous opinion, the court cited the \u201ctraumatic threats and harassment\u201d the families [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":35593,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[31513,29266,1723],"class_list":["post-35592","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics","tag-965-million","tag-alex-jones","tag-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35592","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=35592"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35592\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35594,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35592\/revisions\/35594"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/35593"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=35592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=35592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=35592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}