The US military has issued a new guide to \u2018Civilian Harm Mitigation\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The US Department of Defense on Thursday published an instruction on \u201cCivilian Harm Mitigation and Response,\u201d outlining new procedures to prevent striking noncombatants and how to deal with it when it happens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The 52-page document<\/a> was sent out to all branches of the military, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the combatant commands and lays out the new policies for \u201cCHRM.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe release of the DOD instruction continues the process of improving the department\u2019s approach to mitigating and responding to civilian harm,\u201d Pentagon spokesman Major General Pat Ryder told reporters at a press briefing on Thursday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new policy is the result of two reviews of civilian casualty incidents in Syria, the Military Times reported. Both reviews were launched in 2021. One dealt with the 2019 bombing of Baghouz that killed \u201cdozens\u201d of noncombatants, while the other examined the fighting to reclaim Raqqa from Islamic State (IS, also known as ISIS) in 2017 in 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Both reviews found that the Pentagon \u201cdid not have codified policies on preventing civilian harm or handling its aftermath,\u201d according to the outlet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The newly published instruction calls for the military to identify what it needs to target and execute strikes more precisely, and directs the Defense Department to engage in \u201cperiodic dialogue and consultations with representatives and experts from civil society organizations, non-governmental organizations, and international organizations\u201d regarding CHMR policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new policy requires US military components to \u201cconduct, document, and archive timely and thorough assessments of civilian harm\u201d that may have resulted from operations, and identify measures to \u201cmitigate the likelihood of future incidents.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n When civilian casualties happen, the US military is instructed to acknowledge it and \u201crespond to individuals and communities affected,\u201d including expressing condolences. The military also needs to \u201cidentify, document, and disseminate lessons learned, recommendations, and effective practices related to CHMR\u201d and incorporate them into doctrine and procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Pentagon has also launched a new CHMR website<\/a> and is working to stand up a \u201ccenter of excellence\u201d headed by one of the researchers into the Raqqa report, Michael McNerney.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The US has rarely acknowledged causing civilian casualties, and on the occasions it had, cleared its military of any wrongdoing. The most notable recent incident involved a drone strike in August 2021, during the scramble to evacuate from Afghanistan. Following a suicide bombing outside the Kabul airport, the Pentagon claimed to have killed a terrorist<\/a> mastermind and kept insisting the strike had been \u201crighteous\u201d amid reports of civilian deaths. The official line only changed a month later, after a media investigation<\/a> showed the attack had targeted a charity worker and killed ten civilians \u2013 seven of them children. In December 2021, the US military announced<\/a> that no one involved in the strike would be punished.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The US military has issued a new guide to \u2018Civilian Harm Mitigation\u2019<\/p>\n\n\n\n The US Department of Defense on Thursday published an instruction on \u201cCivilian Harm Mitigation and Response,\u201d outlining new procedures to prevent striking noncombatants and how to deal with it when it happens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The 52-page document<\/a> was sent out to all branches of the military, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the combatant commands and lays out the new policies for \u201cCHRM.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe release of the DOD instruction continues the process of improving the department\u2019s approach to mitigating and responding to civilian harm,\u201d Pentagon spokesman Major General Pat Ryder told reporters at a press briefing on Thursday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new policy is the result of two reviews of civilian casualty incidents in Syria, the Military Times reported. Both reviews were launched in 2021. One dealt with the 2019 bombing of Baghouz that killed \u201cdozens\u201d of noncombatants, while the other examined the fighting to reclaim Raqqa from Islamic State (IS, also known as ISIS) in 2017 in 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Both reviews found that the Pentagon \u201cdid not have codified policies on preventing civilian harm or handling its aftermath,\u201d according to the outlet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The newly published instruction calls for the military to identify what it needs to target and execute strikes more precisely, and directs the Defense Department to engage in \u201cperiodic dialogue and consultations with representatives and experts from civil society organizations, non-governmental organizations, and international organizations\u201d regarding CHMR policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The new policy requires US military components to \u201cconduct, document, and archive timely and thorough assessments of civilian harm\u201d that may have resulted from operations, and identify measures to \u201cmitigate the likelihood of future incidents.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n When civilian casualties happen, the US military is instructed to acknowledge it and \u201crespond to individuals and communities affected,\u201d including expressing condolences. The military also needs to \u201cidentify, document, and disseminate lessons learned, recommendations, and effective practices related to CHMR\u201d and incorporate them into doctrine and procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Pentagon has also launched a new CHMR website<\/a> and is working to stand up a \u201ccenter of excellence\u201d headed by one of the researchers into the Raqqa report, Michael McNerney.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The US has rarely acknowledged causing civilian casualties, and on the occasions it had, cleared its military of any wrongdoing. The most notable recent incident involved a drone strike in August 2021, during the scramble to evacuate from Afghanistan. Following a suicide bombing outside the Kabul airport, the Pentagon claimed to have killed a terrorist<\/a> mastermind and kept insisting the strike had been \u201crighteous\u201d amid reports of civilian deaths. The official line only changed a month later, after a media investigation<\/a> showed the attack had targeted a charity worker and killed ten civilians \u2013 seven of them children. In December 2021, the US military announced<\/a> that no one involved in the strike would be punished.<\/p>\n\n\n\n