{"id":19676,"date":"2023-10-31T02:42:04","date_gmt":"2023-10-31T07:42:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=19676"},"modified":"2023-10-31T02:42:08","modified_gmt":"2023-10-31T07:42:08","slug":"as-fisa-turns-45-time-to-rethink-post-9-11-mass-surveillance-expansion-under-section-702","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/?p=19676","title":{"rendered":"As FISA turns 45, time to rethink post-9\/11 mass surveillance expansion under Section 702"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Forty-five years ago this month, President&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/people\/jimmy-carter\/\"><u>Jimmy Carter\u2002<\/u><\/a>signed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to restrain U.S. intelligence agencies\u2019 power to spy on Americans. A 1976 Senate&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.intelligence.senate.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/94755_III.pdf\"><u>investigation<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;had found that the FBI\u2019s COINTELPRO surveillance had committed many actions \u2014 particularly against Black liberation groups and other targeted organizations \u2014 that were illegal, violent, or simply \u201cabhorrent in a free society.\u201d FISA was&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/what-went-wrong-fisa-court\"><u>designed<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;to prevent such violations by regulating national security surveillance, yet 45 years later, it has become precisely what it aimed to restrain: a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/coalition-statement-urges-congress-reform-section-702\"><u>domestic spying tool<\/u><\/a>.\u201d One provision of FISA scheduled to expire at the end of this year, Section 702, exemplifies how the nominal progress made in restraining mass surveillance since the 1970s has dramatically backslid since the 9\/11 attacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Section 702, enacted in 2008, authorizes the U.S. government to warrantlessly vacuum up and store the communications of foreigners abroad who are believed to possess \u201cforeign intelligence information.\u201d The contents of U.S. citizens\u2019 and residents\u2019 text messages, phone calls, and emails are collected \u201cincidentally\u201d when they talk to targeted people. Their communications are then stored in a sprawling database, which several intelligence agencies can access via \u201cbackdoor searches\u201d that&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/demandprogress\/letters\/2023-06-13_SJC_Sec_702_and_related_authorities_hearing_Demand_Progress.pdf\"><u>circumvent<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;the constitutional protections nominally afforded to us. They did so at least&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2023\/03\/section-702s-unconstitutional-domestic-spying-program-must-end\"><u>3.4 million times<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;in 2021 alone. Even after remediation measures, in 2022 the FBI still searched for&nbsp;<a href=\"#oversight3\"><u>U.S. persons<\/u><\/a>\u2019 communications&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/politics\/national-security\/fbi-warrantless-searches-us-citizen-data-plunged-2022-rcna82061\"><u>200,000 times<\/u><\/a>, including over&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/coalition-statement-urges-congress-reform-section-702\"><u>8,000<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;that violated regulations, without a warrant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Today, critics of Section 702&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/demandprogress\/letters\/2023-06-13_SJC_Sec_702_and_related_authorities_hearing_Demand_Progress.pdf\"><u>argue<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;that government agents should at minimum be required to obtain a warrant in most cases before reading Americans\u2019 private messages. Even an independent oversight board recently&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/documents.pclob.gov\/prod\/Documents\/OversightReport\/054417e4-9d20-427a-9850-862a6f29ac42\/2023 PCLOB 702 Report (002).pdf\"><u>held<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;that Congress should mandate a court order to access our communications. Section 702 supporters, on the other hand,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/section-702-fisa-civil-liberties-surveillance-terrorism-pclob-56903b24\"><u>assert<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;that doing so would compromise national security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Section 702 is squarely a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawfaremedia.org\/article\/a-look-at-the-pclob-report-on-section-702\"><u>product<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;of the post-9\/11 moment. In the wake of the 9\/11 attacks, U.S. intelligence and national security institutions mushroomed, claiming rights to seize more and more of the world\u2019s communications with less and less oversight. Section 702 is designed for foreignintelligence, yet its supporters are&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/opinion\/congress-blog\/4154631-reauthorizing-section-702-of-the-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act-is-a-national-security-imperative\/\"><u>defending<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;the right to access data unintentionally collected on U.S. persons, without having to undergo meaningful judicial scrutiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Three key issues with Section 702 demonstrate how repurposing FISA for mass domestic surveillance after 9\/11 has led intelligence agencies to repeat the violations the original FISA was designed to address: the provision\u2019s abuses, targets, and lack of transparency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">For one, like the FBI\u2019s COINTELPRO decades ago, Section 702 has drawn increasing scrutiny due to recently revealed abuses. COINTELPRO spied on and persecuted LGBTQ government employees; bugged Martin Luther King Jr.\u2019s bedroom; and used wiretaps and infiltrators to undermine the Black Panther Party. Today, the FBI has conducted \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.intelligence.gov\/assets\/documents\/702 Documents\/declassified\/21\/2021_FISC_Certification_Opinion.pdf\"><u>persistent and widespread<\/u><\/a>\u201d violations of even the weak Section 702 regulations, by targeting&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2023\/05\/19\/fbi-surveillance-black-lives-matter-protesters-00097924\"><u>Black Lives Matter protesters<\/u><\/a>, 19,000 donors to a congressional campaign, and relatives of FBI analysts without justification.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Secondly, Section 702 \u2014 like the abuses uncovered over 45 years ago, along with countless post-9\/11 programs such as the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.cuny.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/page-assets\/academics\/clinics\/immigration\/clear\/Mapping-Muslims.pdf\"><u>NYPD\u2019s Muslim surveillance program<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;\u2014 may target racialized groups suspected of potential \u201cforeign influence,\u201d such as Muslims,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/stopaapihate.org\/2023\/09\/13\/reform-section-702\/\"><u>Asian Americans<\/u><\/a>, and Black dissidents. This targeting&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/87390\/the-year-of-section-702-reform-part-iii-why-congress-should-not-exempt-warrantless-foreign-intelligence-queries\/\"><u>echoes<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;and reproduces longstanding practices of racialized surveillance. The&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/watson.brown.edu\/costsofwar\/papers\/2023\/surveillance\"><u>costs<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;of these practices must always be tallied in terms of speech stifled, social justice movements suppressed, careers destroyed and fear spread.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Finally, it is difficult to fully reckon with these costs, or with who pays them, because the government has long refused public oversight of Section 702. For example, it has&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.justsecurity.org\/87893\/the-governments-section-702-playbook-doesnt-work-anymore\/\"><u>blocked<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;civil cases before federal courts can rule on the provision\u2019s constitutionality. It is not even&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/issues\/national-security\/warrantless-surveillance-under-section-702-fisa?redirect=issues\/national-security\/privacy-and-surveillance\/warrantless-surveillance-under-section-702-fisa\"><u>clear<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;how many American citizens and residents Section 702 impacts, since the government cannot say how many are in the database. Without meaningful oversight, meaningful debate is impossible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Civil liberties groups and other advocates are attempting to move us beyond this post-9\/11 d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu by demanding that Section 702 either be substantively reformed to protect constitutional rights, or be allowed to lapse altogether. The U.S. government has a long and sordid history of using mass surveillance tools like Section 702 against liberation movements, people of color, and political dissidents; abusing its access to our data;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/nation\/2013\/07\/31\/nsa-surveillance-senate\/2601953\/\"><u>overstating<\/u><\/a>&nbsp;the effectiveness of its programs; and blocking oversight. It is vital to keep these histories in mind. We must not continue repeating the failures of the past.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\">Jessica Katzenstein is a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard University and the National Science Foundation, and a contributor to the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/watson.brown.edu\/costsofwar\/\"><u>Costs of War project\u2002<\/u><\/a>at Brown University\u2019s Watson Institute. Read her research on post-9\/11 mass surveillance&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/watson.brown.edu\/costsofwar\/papers\/2023\/surveillance\"><u>here<\/u><\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-medium-font-size\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/opinion\/congress-blog\/4282617-as-fisa-turns-45-time-to-rethink-post-9-11-mass-surveillance-expansion-under-section-702\/\">Thehill<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Forty-five years ago this month, President&nbsp;Jimmy Carter\u2002signed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to restrain U.S. intelligence agencies\u2019 power to spy on Americans. A 1976 Senate&nbsp;investigation&nbsp;had found that the FBI\u2019s COINTELPRO surveillance had committed many actions \u2014 particularly against Black liberation groups and other targeted organizations \u2014 that were illegal, violent, or simply \u201cabhorrent in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":19677,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1152],"tags":[1365,23771,9712,7034,23772,23773,21056,2033],"class_list":["post-19676","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-humanrights","tag-black","tag-domesticspy","tag-fisa","tag-freedom","tag-jimmy-carter","tag-liberation-groups","tag-usa","tag-violence"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19676","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19676"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19676\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19678,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19676\/revisions\/19678"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/19677"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19676"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19676"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ustower.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19676"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}