A New York judge dismissed Donald Trump’s 2021 lawsuit against The New York Times on Wednesday and ordered the former president to pay attorneys\u2019 fees for the paper and three of its journalists who are listed as defendants.
In his ruling Wednesday, Justice Robert R. Reed of the state Supreme Court in New York County said Trump’s claims against the Times and three of its journalists for their Pulitzer-winning series on his undisclosed finances in 2018 “fail as a matter of constitutional law.” (Supreme Court is the name of New York’s top trial court.)
“Courts have long recognized that reporters are entitled to engage in legal and ordinary newsgathering activities without fear of tort liability \u2014 as these actions are at the very core of protected First Amendment activity,\u201d Reed wrote.
Reed, a Democrat, also ordered that Trump pay the paper and its journalists\u2019 attorneys\u2019 fees, legal expenses and costs.
Reed’s ruling comes as a defeat for Trump, who filed the $100 million lawsuit in 2021 against the Times, his estranged niece Mary Trump and others. The lawsuit alleged Mary Trump and three journalists from the paper \u2014 Susanne Craig, David Barstow and Russell Buettner \u2014 \u201cengaged in an insidious plot to obtain confidential and highly-sensitive records which they exploited for their own benefit and utilized as a means of falsely legitimizing their publicized works.\u201d
Trump\u2019s lawyers argued that the Times had played a role in \u201ctortious interference\u201d with a contract, knowingly breaching his contractual rights with his niece from a 2001 settlement agreement that bound her to confidentiality and nondisclosure of certain records.
Citing precedent in New York courts, Reed dismissed the tortious interference claim \u201cbecause The Times defendants\u2019 purpose in reporting on a newsworthy story constitutes justification as a matter of law.” He further argued that the First Amendment\u2019s guarantee of freedom of the press to report on newsworthy subjects guards against such claims.
The Times welcomed the decision.
“The New York Times is pleased with the judge\u2019s decision today. It is an important precedent reaffirming that the press is protected when it engages in routine newsgathering to obtain information of vital importance to the public,” Charlie Stadtlander, a spokesperson, said in a statement.
While Wednesday\u2019s ruling dismisses the claims against the Times and its journalists, a ruling has not yet been rendered about Mary Trump, who has also filed a motion to dismiss.
A spokesperson and a lawyer for Donald Trump did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday evening. Neither did a lawyer for Mary Trump.
Trump\u2019s lawsuit is just one example of his legal battles over the disclosure of his finances.
While Trump tried for years to keep his tax records from public view, breaking in precedent from many of his predecessors and engaging in a lengthy court fight to keep them private, the House Ways and Means Committee finally obtained and voted to publicly release them last year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n