While Gov. Ron DeSantis and the College Board fought over an Advanced Placement African American studies course and so-called \u201cdivisive concepts\u201d like \u201ccritical race theory,\u201d school districts across the country were already working on integrating Black Studies concepts across curriculums without walling off classes to select students or inflaming political controversies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A new AP class was never going to be the best avenue to introduce Black history to high school students. Significant racial and ethnic disparities still persist in Advanced Placement classes\u2014and the College Board\u2019s standardized testing inherently advantages wealthier students, who attend higher-ranked schools with more AP offerings and are able to pay for expensive test prep resources. The Florida controversy also recalls a similar episode in 2015, when the College Board caved after nearly a year of tussles with conservative politicians and academics over its AP United States History framework. Among other changes, the revised framework de-emphasized British colonial confrontations with Native Americans and omitted direct references to \u201cwhite racial superiority\u201d and xenophobia in lessons on slavery and Manifest Destiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
California has been a longtime leader in ethnic studies and Black history education. San Francisco State University established the country\u2019s first College of Ethnic Studies in 1969 after Black Student Union leaders joined other student groups to demand course offerings that would reflect the histories and cultures of the state\u2019s people of color. More than 50 years later, state lawmakers added a semester-long course in ethnic studies to high school graduation requirements beginning in the 2029-2030 school year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Many educators view Black history as merely an add-on to conventional American history lessons that portray white people as central figures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Last June, California\u2019s reparations task force, the country\u2019s first, released a nearly 500-page interim report that not only recommended an advanced timeline for ethnic studies classes in high schools, but also the creation of a K-12 Black Studies curriculum. One member of the task force told MarketWatch that these recommendations \u201cdirectly counter this movement toward ignorance,\u201d referring to Gov. DeSantis\u2019s efforts to rid Florida public schools of all things \u201cwoke.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the fall of 2020, the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD), which serves over 50,000 students, implemented a K-12 Black Studies framework and curriculum for the 2022-2023 academic year. Currently, SFUSD\u2019s Ethnic Studies program funds a part-time teacher on special assignment to create Black Studies lessons, as well as an optional Black Studies unit for high school Ethnic Studies teachers. For the moment, the materials are only being used in high schools.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Prospect explored the SFUSD program with two Black high school teachers who created Black Studies lessons for the district. Citing privacy and safety concerns, both educators requested anonymity. As native Californians, both teachers are well aware that their state is often heralded as a progressive haven, even though it is no freer from racism than any other area of the country. The first teacher shared the story of their grandfather, whose family sent him to California at a young age in 1938 out of fear he would be killed by whites in his native Texas. This teacher explained that while it is easy to point fingers at the South, it is equally important to acknowledge educational shortcomings in more liberal areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
American Prospect Carousel
Trying to Erase Black History Won\u2019t Work
READ MORE
00:00
\/
00:50
\u201cWhat\u2019s happening in Florida is despicable,\u201d they said. \u201cStudents should have access to Black studies on every level, kindergarten through a doctoral program. But what\u2019s even more egregious is that everybody doesn\u2019t have Black studies.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The second teacher added that they operate from the premise that the contemporary American educational system structurally disadvantages students of color. \u201cWe were separated and given less resources,\u201d they said. \u201cAnd still to this day, if you compare the average school that has a majority-Black population with one that has a white student population, the resources are not the same.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The teachers\u2019 lessons borrow key ethnic studies themes such as anti-oppression and anti-imperialism (such as reframing the Westward Expansion as \u201ceastern encroachment\u201d of settlers on indigenous lands). They also strive to highlight issues facing local residents, matching students with local political groups and creating lessons on mutual aid projects such as community refrigerators, a grassroots social service that supplies free fresh perishables to food-insecure neighborhoods.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to LaGarrett J. King, an associate professor of social studies education at the University at Buffalo, many educators view Black history as merely an add-on to conventional American history lessons that portray white people as central figures, while glossing over Black people\u2019s experiences and contributions. \u201cIf you really teach Black history, the traditional narrative doesn\u2019t make any sense,\u201d he said. \u201cBecause the perspectives are different and understanding the lived realities are totally different.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In \u201cBlack History Is Not American History,\u201d King detailed \u201cBlack historical consciousness\u201d principles for educators to incorporate into their curriculums, such as Africa and the African Diaspora; Black agency, resistance, and perseverance; and Black identities. Collectively, these themes aim to \u201cexplore Black identity through complex and nuanced narratives that attempt to get at the full humanity of Black people.\u201d \u201cI like to tell people all the time, many times we teach about Black history, but we don\u2019t teach through Black history,\u201d said King. \u201cBy that I mean, using the narratives and perspectives of Black people to teach Black history.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He noted that many teachers typically frame the Supreme Court\u2019s landmark decision, Brown v. Board of Education, as a positive historical event that ended racial segregation in public schools and propelled the country in a progressive direction. However, this narrative implies that most Black schools at the time were academically inferior to white schools, and that Black students needed to attend white schools in order to receive a better education. African Americans, King added, believed that Black schools held them to high standards and were no worse than the white schools they integrated. In fact, Black students and their families often preferred their own schools because they experienced racism from their white teachers and peers in integrated settings. He argued that this discriminatory treatment contributes to the ongoing racial achievement gaps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Beyond the Golden State, Delaware, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Maine have all enacted legislation mandating Black history courses in public schools even as Republican states continue to resist comprehensive Black history instruction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n